Innovators (any businesses) should factor human behavior (and the potential for bad behavior of individuals and groups) into their business model. Failure to do so is the fault of innovators, not the public-at-large.

If businesses can re-organize around niches a) the cost of enforcing behavior is going to decrease, b) surfacing hidden costs like externalities becomes cheaper, and c) it becomes easier to monitor bad behavior. The mechanics, of course, is the most interesting bit.
.-= Taylor Davidson´s last blog ..Working Nowhere and Everywhere: The Zen of Running A Virtual Studio =-.

The real takeaway is that as an increasing amount of products and services are built upon communities and aggregating masses of people, understanding group interaction dynamics (game mechanics, for one) is an increasing key performance indicator and must be built into the product/service itself.
.-= Taylor Davidson´s last blog ..Creating the Intention Economy =-.

However, there’s no such thing as a perfect system. I have faith that in due time, people will come to their senses and make some concessions about respect.

It is simply unfair that innovators and good faith consumers should have to put up with the behavior of those who seek to exploit such innovation.

Unfortunately, the abuse of innovation in a destructive manner seems to be something of an ingrained reality – I wish it weren’t the case.
.-= Andrew´s last blog ..Should models be sacked for being ‘too fat’ =-.