<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Innovation &#8211; Filing a non-patent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frogblog.biz/2010/01/20/open-innovation-filing-a-non-patent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frogblog.biz/2010/01/20/open-innovation-filing-a-non-patent/</link>
	<description>Jump In, The Water&#039;s Fine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 04:28:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaVonn</title>
		<link>http://frogblog.biz/2010/01/20/open-innovation-filing-a-non-patent/comment-page-1/#comment-3718</link>
		<dc:creator>LaVonn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frogblog.biz/?p=2042#comment-3718</guid>
		<description>Fascinating discussion on a challenging topic...Coming from a product development background the need to patent &quot;everything&quot; is, in my opinion, a deterrent to growth.  And, when you get into a place where we start &quot;owning&quot; broad, conceptual thinking -- well, it becomes a mess even for the most dedicated innovator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating discussion on a challenging topic&#8230;Coming from a product development background the need to patent &#8220;everything&#8221; is, in my opinion, a deterrent to growth.  And, when you get into a place where we start &#8220;owning&#8221; broad, conceptual thinking &#8212; well, it becomes a mess even for the most dedicated innovator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.D. Meier</title>
		<link>http://frogblog.biz/2010/01/20/open-innovation-filing-a-non-patent/comment-page-1/#comment-3717</link>
		<dc:creator>J.D. Meier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frogblog.biz/?p=2042#comment-3717</guid>
		<description>Patents are an interesting game.  I wanted to learn more about the process, so one year I filed 8.  I learned a lot.  The toughest part was creating a visual example to show the unique value or &quot;secret sauce.&quot;  It was yet another example, where it&#039;s not good enough to have a good idea ... you need to show it and sell it to others in a way that sticks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patents are an interesting game.  I wanted to learn more about the process, so one year I filed 8.  I learned a lot.  The toughest part was creating a visual example to show the unique value or &#8220;secret sauce.&#8221;  It was yet another example, where it&#8217;s not good enough to have a good idea &#8230; you need to show it and sell it to others in a way that sticks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred H. Schlegel</title>
		<link>http://frogblog.biz/2010/01/20/open-innovation-filing-a-non-patent/comment-page-1/#comment-3716</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred H. Schlegel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frogblog.biz/?p=2042#comment-3716</guid>
		<description>Great list here Kay. I think I would only broaden your point about the k-12 schools to include somehow dealing with the environment around the schools as well as within. But maybe the Entrepreneurship Golden Globes is the real answer here. Make inventing sexy again. I really like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great list here Kay. I think I would only broaden your point about the k-12 schools to include somehow dealing with the environment around the schools as well as within. But maybe the Entrepreneurship Golden Globes is the real answer here. Make inventing sexy again. I really like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred H. Schlegel</title>
		<link>http://frogblog.biz/2010/01/20/open-innovation-filing-a-non-patent/comment-page-1/#comment-3715</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred H. Schlegel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frogblog.biz/?p=2042#comment-3715</guid>
		<description>The Cell phone industry seems to be littered with these suits. I believe Apple and Nokia are in the process of waging all out war over alleged mutual patent infringements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cell phone industry seems to be littered with these suits. I believe Apple and Nokia are in the process of waging all out war over alleged mutual patent infringements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred H. Schlegel</title>
		<link>http://frogblog.biz/2010/01/20/open-innovation-filing-a-non-patent/comment-page-1/#comment-3714</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred H. Schlegel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frogblog.biz/?p=2042#comment-3714</guid>
		<description>There are a significant number of technologists who seem ready to embrace the possibility. The entire open source movement is based on the idea of making share and share alike the rule of the day. I think part of this might be a reaction to the patent process overstepping - patenting overly broad concepts or seemingly obvious prior art rather than the traditional focus on specific inventions - a trend that seems to be slowing. A more reasoned approach probably is some combination of open and patents. There are plenty of reasons to give inventors a decade or two to enjoy the fruits of their labor before being copied directly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a significant number of technologists who seem ready to embrace the possibility. The entire open source movement is based on the idea of making share and share alike the rule of the day. I think part of this might be a reaction to the patent process overstepping &#8211; patenting overly broad concepts or seemingly obvious prior art rather than the traditional focus on specific inventions &#8211; a trend that seems to be slowing. A more reasoned approach probably is some combination of open and patents. There are plenty of reasons to give inventors a decade or two to enjoy the fruits of their labor before being copied directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kay plantes</title>
		<link>http://frogblog.biz/2010/01/20/open-innovation-filing-a-non-patent/comment-page-1/#comment-3713</link>
		<dc:creator>kay plantes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frogblog.biz/?p=2042#comment-3713</guid>
		<description>I learned today that the US Patent Office is so backed up that it takes years for patents to be issued.  I suspect this is part of IBM&#039;s decision to &quot;publish.&quot; 

Patents are a measure of our innovation and while the US remains ahead of other countries, our lead is closing significantly.  This factor, combined with the growing commoditization of most markets that sends work overseas has hindered job creation significantly. The best thing that Obama can do is to pursue an innovation agenda:
1. Far more money in basic research, which the government funds;
2. Create incentives for companies to pool resources together (perhaps with Government match) to engage in development too expensive for any one company, but critical to our country&#039;s future manufacturing;
3. Fix our PK-12 schools;
4. Allow the PhDs we educate and PhDs from other countries to reside here---our economic security is far more of an issue than our physical security as far as I can read;
5. Make a class in entrepreneurship and economics mandatory for every HS and College student. We&#039;d change our culture within a generation;
6. Make it more financially attractive to invest in start ups and early stage companies;
7. Create a health care plan for start-ups so that lack of health care does not stop people from being entrepreurs;
8. Create a Golden Globes for entrepreneurs with Steve Martin hosting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I learned today that the US Patent Office is so backed up that it takes years for patents to be issued.  I suspect this is part of IBM&#8217;s decision to &#8220;publish.&#8221; </p>
<p>Patents are a measure of our innovation and while the US remains ahead of other countries, our lead is closing significantly.  This factor, combined with the growing commoditization of most markets that sends work overseas has hindered job creation significantly. The best thing that Obama can do is to pursue an innovation agenda:<br />
1. Far more money in basic research, which the government funds;<br />
2. Create incentives for companies to pool resources together (perhaps with Government match) to engage in development too expensive for any one company, but critical to our country&#8217;s future manufacturing;<br />
3. Fix our PK-12 schools;<br />
4. Allow the PhDs we educate and PhDs from other countries to reside here&#8212;our economic security is far more of an issue than our physical security as far as I can read;<br />
5. Make a class in entrepreneurship and economics mandatory for every HS and College student. We&#8217;d change our culture within a generation;<br />
6. Make it more financially attractive to invest in start ups and early stage companies;<br />
7. Create a health care plan for start-ups so that lack of health care does not stop people from being entrepreurs;<br />
8. Create a Golden Globes for entrepreneurs with Steve Martin hosting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Cornies</title>
		<link>http://frogblog.biz/2010/01/20/open-innovation-filing-a-non-patent/comment-page-1/#comment-3711</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Cornies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frogblog.biz/?p=2042#comment-3711</guid>
		<description>I follow Waterloo&#039;s Research in Motion and their Blackberry quite closely.  It seems there is a lot of competition in this sector which leads to suits about patent infringements.  It&#039;s a major headache for the company if the suits are questionable as they draw out in the courts for a long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I follow Waterloo&#8217;s Research in Motion and their Blackberry quite closely.  It seems there is a lot of competition in this sector which leads to suits about patent infringements.  It&#8217;s a major headache for the company if the suits are questionable as they draw out in the courts for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://frogblog.biz/2010/01/20/open-innovation-filing-a-non-patent/comment-page-1/#comment-3710</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frogblog.biz/?p=2042#comment-3710</guid>
		<description>Fred,

Interesting - I wonder if this is a sign of changing business trends. Is it possible that over time we will see a shift in emphasis away from the formal patenting process and toward this kind of openness?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred,</p>
<p>Interesting &#8211; I wonder if this is a sign of changing business trends. Is it possible that over time we will see a shift in emphasis away from the formal patenting process and toward this kind of openness?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

